Former chief justice Abdul Hamid Mohamad has highlighted the problems faced by Muslims in Penang, which he warned could spread if left unchecked.
Among others, he said a former Penang mufti told him that it was difficult to secure allocations for Islamic activities in the state as various religious groups wanted their fair share.
"If this is not stopped, it will spread to the whole of Malaysia. Maybe Islamic programmes will have to be shared with other religions.
"Government departments and campuses may be required to not only prepare surau but also churches, gurdwara and temples," he added.
Such a scenario, he said, would render the special position of Islam as the religion of the Federation meaningless.
Hamid was speaking at a buka puasa event with several Islamic NGOs in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.
A copy of his speech, titled "Protecting the constitution as the basis of the country", was also uploaded on his website.
The former chief justice, who hails from Penang, revealed that the mufti also informed him about an incident during the launching of a building in the state, which was attended by the deputy chief minister.
At this event, he said, prayers were done by a Christian priest, a Hindu priest and the imam of the state mosque.
"I am puzzled why would the imam participate in such a ceremony. Can't he think?" he asked.
"I am saddened to see Malays and Muslims behaving naively where they are made as tools and shout 'Allahu Akbar' while lying on road when it is non-Muslims who benefit," he added.
Hamid was referring to the protest that followed BN retaking Perak in the aftermath of the 2008 general election.
Commenting on the "Allah" row, Hamid said he is puzzled that some Islamic scholars did not see the "hidden agenda" of the Roman Catholic Church.
He claimed that the church was disappointed for not being able to turn the Malays into Christians five centuries ago.
MORE TO FOLLOW FROM MALAYSIAKINI
Promoting Thinking Minds Via Rational Rationale
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Tuesday, 22 July 2014
Tuesday, 10 June 2014
Islamaphobes?
GEORGE TOWN, June 10 ― A coalition of Muslim groups here want Putrajaya to retain the Sedition Act 1948 and reject the three national harmony laws that they allege were drafted by “Islamaphobes” and detrimental to Malays and Islam.
The groups gathering under the umbrella body of Pertubuhan Pembela-pembela Islam (Pembela) also claimed the proposed laws would cause “chaos” in Malaysia, but did not elaborate on the nature of this chaos.
“All these three bills contained elements of ‘Islamophobia extremism’ that are anti-Malay and anti-Islam,” said Pembela chairman Mohamed Hafiz Mohamed Nordin in a press conference at noon today.
He explained that the term was in retaliation to what he called the frequent labelling of Malay-Muslim groups as “extremists” by their non-Muslim counterparts, including those in the federal body that drew up the bills.
“The way these three bills are drafted by a small group of people in the working committee of the National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC) is worrying and against how bills are conventionally drafted,” Mohamed Hafiz claimed.
He claimed that the draft bills were drafted by just three people and did not undergo proper consultation or detailed discussions between relevant parties before they were handed over to Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri.
Last week, the NUCC proposed three bills - Racial and Religious Hate Crimes Bill, National Harmony and Reconciliation Bill and National Harmony and Reconciliation Commission Bill — to replace the Sedition Act.
Putrajaya announced two years ago that it plans to repeal the colonial era law.
Today, Mohamed Hafiz also expressed concern over contents of the bills that he claimed contained anti-Malay and anti-Islam elements.
“These proposed bills were presented as promoting unity but in actual fact, these bills will only cause a deeper rift between races and religion in the country especially in emphasising on equality without taking into consideration the ‘positive discrimination’ principles,” he said.
He claimed the draft bills also sought to incite hatred and anti-Malay sentiments by describing the Malay and Bumiputera special privileges under the Federal Constitution as “discrimination” and “racial superiority”.
He said all three draft bills also set aside the position of the Islam as the religion of the federation as well as that of the Malay Rulers.
He then extolled the benefits of retaining the Sedition Act that he said was needed to protect the foundation of the country by ensuring Articles 153, 152, 181 and Part III of the Federal Constitution are protected.
“Article 153, 152, 181 and Part III of the Federal Constitution are what the non-residents agreed to in order to become citizens of Malaya then, so to go against this agreement after so long can only be interpreted as a deliberate action to undo the agreement that was long agreed upon,” he said.
Article 153 refers to the special position of the Malays and Bumiputera in Malaysia, Article 152 pertains to Malay as the national language, while Article 181 refers to the sovereignty of the rulers; Part III deals with the conditions for citizenship in the country.
Mohamed Hafiz, who was accompanied by members from other Muslim NGOs, said they will seek to meet the prime minister to submit their objections against the repealing of the Sedition Act and the proposed harmony bills.
A Muslim welfare NGO president Ismail Mina Ahmad said there is no place for such “liberal” bills to be implemented in the country.
“Liberalism has not context in Malaysia as liberalism is against Islam and if we have too much of liberal politics, the whole country will end in chaos and rife,” he warned.
The Malay Mail
The groups gathering under the umbrella body of Pertubuhan Pembela-pembela Islam (Pembela) also claimed the proposed laws would cause “chaos” in Malaysia, but did not elaborate on the nature of this chaos.
“All these three bills contained elements of ‘Islamophobia extremism’ that are anti-Malay and anti-Islam,” said Pembela chairman Mohamed Hafiz Mohamed Nordin in a press conference at noon today.
He explained that the term was in retaliation to what he called the frequent labelling of Malay-Muslim groups as “extremists” by their non-Muslim counterparts, including those in the federal body that drew up the bills.
“The way these three bills are drafted by a small group of people in the working committee of the National Unity Consultative Council (NUCC) is worrying and against how bills are conventionally drafted,” Mohamed Hafiz claimed.
He claimed that the draft bills were drafted by just three people and did not undergo proper consultation or detailed discussions between relevant parties before they were handed over to Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Nancy Shukri.
Last week, the NUCC proposed three bills - Racial and Religious Hate Crimes Bill, National Harmony and Reconciliation Bill and National Harmony and Reconciliation Commission Bill — to replace the Sedition Act.
Putrajaya announced two years ago that it plans to repeal the colonial era law.
Today, Mohamed Hafiz also expressed concern over contents of the bills that he claimed contained anti-Malay and anti-Islam elements.
“These proposed bills were presented as promoting unity but in actual fact, these bills will only cause a deeper rift between races and religion in the country especially in emphasising on equality without taking into consideration the ‘positive discrimination’ principles,” he said.
He claimed the draft bills also sought to incite hatred and anti-Malay sentiments by describing the Malay and Bumiputera special privileges under the Federal Constitution as “discrimination” and “racial superiority”.
He said all three draft bills also set aside the position of the Islam as the religion of the federation as well as that of the Malay Rulers.
He then extolled the benefits of retaining the Sedition Act that he said was needed to protect the foundation of the country by ensuring Articles 153, 152, 181 and Part III of the Federal Constitution are protected.
“Article 153, 152, 181 and Part III of the Federal Constitution are what the non-residents agreed to in order to become citizens of Malaya then, so to go against this agreement after so long can only be interpreted as a deliberate action to undo the agreement that was long agreed upon,” he said.
Article 153 refers to the special position of the Malays and Bumiputera in Malaysia, Article 152 pertains to Malay as the national language, while Article 181 refers to the sovereignty of the rulers; Part III deals with the conditions for citizenship in the country.
Mohamed Hafiz, who was accompanied by members from other Muslim NGOs, said they will seek to meet the prime minister to submit their objections against the repealing of the Sedition Act and the proposed harmony bills.
A Muslim welfare NGO president Ismail Mina Ahmad said there is no place for such “liberal” bills to be implemented in the country.
“Liberalism has not context in Malaysia as liberalism is against Islam and if we have too much of liberal politics, the whole country will end in chaos and rife,” he warned.
The Malay Mail
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)